04 March 2026

From Foxhole to Hospital: My Father's Experience with Trench Foot in World War II

Source: U.S. Army soldiers in a snow-covered defensive position during the Battle of the Bulge, Ardennes, Belgium, winter 1944–1945. Photograph by U.S. Army Signal Corps. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Public domain.

Conditions like these, cold, wet, and unrelenting, led to one of the most common, yet often overlooked injuries of the war: trench foot.

My father, Bruce Glover, experienced one of those conditions firsthand during the winter of 1944 while stationed near Elsenborn, Belgium. What began as days in cold, wet foxholes turned into something much more serious, a diagnosis that would send him across three countries before he recovered: trench foot.

In his own words, he described the moment everything changed:

"A couple of days later our company regrouped and the medics inspected us for any injuries. They asked me to take off my boots which I did not want to do because I had a feeling if I did, I would never get them on again. I was right because I had contacted 'Trench Foot' which was a result of the combination of prolonged cold and wetness in which we had endured the past couple of months. We literally ate, slept, and exercised in our fox holes leaving only long enough to go to the bathroom and maybe once every couple of weeks going behind the lines and getting a shower which consisted of going inside a big barn structure where barrels of cold water were hanging from the rafters and drips of water were released as you pulled a rope hanging from the barrels.

As a result of the inspection, I was sent behind the lines to a temporary hospital in Liege, Belgium and in subsequent weeks to Paris, France and finally to Birmingham, England. My feet were terribly swollen and somewhat painful, but bearable. It took the better part of two months or more before I was finally released from the hospital. One unforgettable moment I remember was a soldier in the next bed to me had a much more severe case of trench foot than I did and developed gangrene in his leg. The doctor came by one morning and with his forceps lifted the entire big toe nail off and the patient (soldier) never felt it. He eventually had to have his lower limb amputated, I heard later."

Trench foot, also known as immersion foot, is a non-freezing injury caused by prolonged exposure to cold and wet conditions. Unlike frostbite, it does not require freezing temperatures. Soldiers standing in wet socks and boots for long periods could lose circulation in their feet, leading to swelling, numbness, pain, and in severe cases, infection or gangrene. 

As long as I can remember, my father was meticulous about keeping his feet dry. What once felt like a simple routine now connects directly to his experience with trench foot during the war.

The official records confirm what my father described. Morning reports document the moment his condition was recognized:

 "Glover Bruce D 36860891 Pfc MOS 746 From dy to ak LD 2d Evacuation Hsp Sta Location Unknown NBC Slight Trench Foot per Sec II Cir 69 HQ ETOUSA"

Just days later, he was admitted to the hospital.

Hospital Admission Record
Date: 23 December 1944
Name: Bruce D. Glover
ASN: 36860891
Grade: Pfc
Organization: 393rd Infantry
Diagnosis: Trench Foot
Condition: Moderate
Hospital: 108th U.S. General Hospital

Even more telling, 18 out of 35 men in that same admission group were diagnosed with trench foot. This was not an isolated case, but part of a larger pattern affecting soldiers in the same harsh winter conditions.

From the front lines near Elsenborn, he was moved through a chain of care: first to a temporary hospital in Liege, then to Paris, and finally to Birmingham, England. He remained hospitalized until May 8, 1945. What my dad remembered as the better part of two months was, according to the records, closer to four and a half months.

This progression reflects the larger evacuation system used during the war, moving soldiers farther from the front as they stabilized but still required care.

One of the most striking memories he carried was not his own injury, but that of another soldier. It is a reminder that trench foot could range from painful to life-altering, depending on severity.

This was just one chapter in my father’s wartime experience, but it offers a glimpse into the realities soldiers faced beyond the battlefield.

Through his words and the official records, I am able to see not just where he served, but what he endured. Trench foot was not simply a diagnosis, it was the result of weeks of exposure, resilience, and survival under harsh conditions. My father always felt that someone was looking out for him in December of 1944. He never returned to combat, as the war in Europe ended on 6 May 1945, and he entered officer training at Fontainebleau, France on 8 May 1945.

Moments like this remind me that military records and personal accounts together tell a fuller story. One gives the facts, the other gives the experience. And it is in combining the two that history becomes something we can truly understand.

Golden Arrow Research

For this research, I worked with Geoff at Golden Arrow Research, who assisted in documenting my father’s World War II military history, including locating and compiling the morning reports used in this post. His work provided the foundation that allowed me to focus on understanding and sharing my father’s experience. More information about his services can be found at https://www.goldenarrowresearch.com/

AI Disclosure

This post was researched and written by me as part of my ongoing work to understand my father’s WWII service. I used ChatGPT 5.2 to assist with title suggestions, proofreading, transcription of the morning report images, and defining abbreviations. All content has been carefully reviewed, edited, and reflects my own research and interpretation.


02 March 2026

Tracing WWII Army Service with Morning Reports: Bruce Glover’s Story

Source: National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), St. Louis, Missouri. U.S. Army Morning Reports, 1912–1974 for Bruce David Glover, Records of the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), St. Louis, Missouri; accessed by Golden Arrow Research. Transcribed by Brenda Leyndyke. 2026

The morning reports didn’t look like much at first. Just lines of typed entries, abbreviations, and dates, the kind of record that feels more administrative than personal. But I knew better. Somewhere in those pages was my dad’s story, Bruce Glover’s path through the Army, waiting to be pieced together. All it would take was time, careful transcription, and a willingness to look beyond the format to see the life behind the record.

Morning reports are not the easiest records to work with. They are typed, abbreviated, and often feel impersonal at first glance. But like so many military records, they tell a story if you are willing to slow down and read them carefully.

I began by transcribing every entry and paid special attention to those that mentioned my dad, Bruce Glover. Line by line, I pulled out the dates, locations, transfers, and notes that marked his and his regiment's movement through the Army. At first, it felt like a series of disconnected entries. A transfer here, a status change there. But as I worked through them, a pattern began to emerge.

What I had, without fully realizing it at first, was a timeline of his service.

Once I had transcribed the relevant details, I turned to a tool I have been using more in my research, ChatGPT 5.2. I provided the extracted information and asked it to organize the data into a clear, chronological timeline.

What it returned was something I hadn’t quite been able to see on my own so clearly. The structure of his service. The progression from induction to training, from training to deployment, and eventually to leadership.

Next, I took ChatGPT's timeline and compared it to my transcription. ChatGPT can make mistakes and it does. I forgot to put do not add anything to the timeline in my prompt and I got a few weird dates and places. Editing ChatGPT's version was still easier than creating my own timeline. I was able to tell ChatGPT want I wanted almost exactly.

Here is that timeline:

June 4, 1943: Sworn in as a private in the U.S. Army Infantry in Detroit, Michigan.

July 1943: Reported to Fort Custer, Battle Creek, Michigan for orientation and processing, attached to Co. D 135th TDTB.

24 July 1943: Traveled to Camp Hood, Texas for 13 weeks of basic infantry training. 137 enlisted men unassigned left Fort Custer for Camp Hood.

28 July 1943: Transferred to Co. D, 128th TDTP

14 August 1943: Transferred to Co. D, 144th ASTB.

27 October 1943-4 November 1943: North Camp Hood, Texas

4 November 1943-20 March 1944: Selected for a specialized program and sent to Hendrix College, Conway, Arkansas, for 4 months of academic military training, in the ASTU Unit No. 3889.

13 March 1944: orders dated that assigns named men to 99th Infantry Division, Camp Maxey, Texas.

21 March 1944: assigned to 393rd Infantry Regiment, Company G, Camp Maxey, Texas.

21 March 1944- 10 September 1944: at Camp Maxey, Texas for intensive training.

10 September 1944: departed Camp Maxey by railroad and traveled to Camp Myes Standish, Massachusetts with stops in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, Montgomery, Alabama for calisthenics, Atlanta, Georgia for calisthenics, Rocky Mountain, and North Carolina for calisthenics.

14 September 1944-27 September 1944: Camp Myles Standish, Massachusetts for training, inoculations, and lectures.

29 September 1944-11 October 1944: Departed by ship from Boston to Southampton, England.

11 October 1944-15 October 1944: departed by rail approximately 40 miles, the traveled by truck 5 miles to Camp D-6, Piddlehinton, Dorset, England.

15 October 1944-3 November 1944: Left Piddlehinton, Dorset, England by truck convoy and arrived in Dorchester, England. Left Dorchester and traveled by train arriving in Southampton. Boarded SS Mecklenberg and departed Southampton at 1800 GMT enroute to LeHavre, France.

4 November 1944: Arrived in Le Havre, France, traveled approximately 125 miles by truck convoy to Paris, France. Traveled another 76 miles to bivouac in an apple orchard.

5 November 1944-7 November 1944: departed Paris France area by truck convoy to Aubel Belgium. Bivouacked in orchard, later moving to 2 barns in area.

7 November 1944-10 November 1944: left Aubel, Belgium area and traveled by truck to Rocherath, Belgium where they moved into defensive positions and relieved 39th Infantry Regiment at midnight.

11 November 1944-18 December 1944: in and around Rocherath, Belgium in defensive positives. Patrols were sent out to spot enemy positions. Some light action, mortar section laid fire on enemy,  rocket bombs overhead, heavy artillery fire from friendly troops, and listening post set up behind enemy lines. The men moved on foot when changing positions.

16 November 1944: assigned to 12th Army Group and further assigned to First U.S. Army.

13 December 1944: still in or near Rocherath and received orders and prepared for an offensive movement in freezing temperatures.

16 December 1944: Experienced what is now known as the beginning of the Battle of the Bulge.

19 December 1944: removed to Elsenborn. Belgium

20 December 1944: Diagnosed with trench foot; evacuated to hospitals in Liege (Belgium), Paris (France), and Birmingham (England).

23 December 1944: in Paris, France hospital, 108th General Hospital HQ.

25 December 1944: evacuated to United Kingdom hospital.

No morning reports until 8 May 1945. I need to look for hospital records, if available.

6 May 1945: War in Europe ends (V-E Day). (My addition, not ChatGPT's)

8 May 1945: Attends Reinforcement Depot Ground Forces Training at Fontainebleau, France.

6 July  1945: Honorably discharged from enlisted service to accept a commission.

7 July 1945: Appointed Temporary Second Lieutenant, Army of the United States.

7 July 1945-30 October 1945: no reports

30 October 1945 – 2 May 1946: Served as Second Lieutenant, Company D, 7th Battalion, 2nd Regiment, IRTC, Fort McClellan, Alabama. Physical Training and Bayonet Instructor.

This is the end of the morning report dates I was given. I can fill in gaps especially until the war in the Pacific ends with other documents.

Seeing it laid out this way changed everything.

The morning reports had given me the raw data. But the timeline gave me the story.

I could follow him from Detroit to Fort Custer, then to Texas, Arkansas, and eventually across the ocean to England and into the Ardennes. I could see the moment his experience shifted from training to combat. I could see the toll, trench foot and evacuation, and then something more, his transition into leadership as an officer.

This is where I see real value in using tools like ChatGPT 5.2 in genealogy research. It did not replace the work. It did not find the records. It did not interpret the meaning of his service.

That part is still ours.

What it did do was help organize, structure, and present the information in a way that made the story clearer. It allowed me to step back and see the full arc of his military experience.

And once I could see it, I could feel it.

This is one of many examples of how combining careful transcription with modern tools can deepen our understanding of the past. The records are still at the heart of the work. But sometimes, a different way of looking at them can bring everything into focus.

Research Notes:

The morning reports are housed at the National Archives in St. Louis. Here are the Record Groups used in my research.

Morning reports:  Record Group 64- Morning Reports, 1940–1946 War Department. (1789 - 09/18/1947)

Muster rolls: Record Group 64- Muster Rolls and Rosters, November 1, 1912–December 31, 1943 , War Department. 1789-9/18/1947

OMPF: Record Group 127-Official Military Personnel Files, 1905–1998

I knew I wouldn’t take the time to compile these myself, so I treated myself to having Geoff at Golden Arrow Research do it for me. My father’s name was highlighted on each image where he appeared, which made my job much easier when looking through more than 400 pages of scans. He did an excellent job and even included a letter I could use to request my father’s pension record, which I didn’t even know he had. The image above is blurry here, but it is perfectly clear on the scans I received. 

If you have the time, patience, and access to St. Louis, go for it. For me, it was worth having someone else compile them. I have heard that morning reports are now digital and accessible through the National Archives catalog, but I have not confirmed this.

AI Disclosure (ChatGPT 5.2)

Journey to the Past blog posts may use the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) tools.

While the content reflects my ideas, writing, and research, ChatGPT 5.2 is used for grammar and style suggestions, as well as for creating timelines.

Headlines on this blog may also be suggested by AI. I review, select, and edit them to ensure they accurately reflect the content.


26 February 2026

Beyond the Records: A Personal Discovery at the National Archives

National Archives in Washington, DC, photographed by Brenda Leyndyke

Last summer, I had the opportunity to attend Gen-Fed in Washington, DC, and the main highlight of that trip was spending time at the National Archives.

This was something I had wanted to do for years.

As a family historian, we spend so much time working with digital records, indexes, and transcriptions. Those tools are invaluable, but they are not the same as being there in person.

Walking into the research room, I felt a sense of awe. I knew that somewhere in that building were records connected to my own family.

When I was finally able to sit down, look at, and touch the documents, it became something more than research.

It became personal when I looked through logbooks from the 1890s and early 1900s for Point Betsie Lighthouse in Frankfort, Michigan, and saw entries for my great-grandfather, Frank H. Glover.

Lighthouse Log Book at NARA in Washington, D.C.

I had the opportunity to view log books from my great grandfather’s time as an assistant lighthouse keeper. Seeing his name written in those records was one thing. But actually being there, turning the pages, and knowing that these were the very documents created during his lifetime, is hard to put into words.

I am emotional just writing this.

There is something powerful about touching a piece of your family’s history. It connects you to them in a way that no digital image ever can.

The log book entry, on the last entry, for Frank H. Glover's resignation in June, 1900

In that moment, my great grandfather was no longer just a name, a date, or an entry in my family tree. He was a person who kept those logs, who lived that life, and whose work was recorded in those pages.

It is an experience I had hoped for, and one I will never forget.

Research Notes:

  • Repository: National Archives I

  • Record type: Lighthouse log books

  • Time period: 1898-1902

  • Location: Record Group 25, Entry Number NC 1 106, Bound volume number 10

  • Access notes: Accessed in person 

This was just one of many records I found documenting my great-grandfather’s life, each adding another piece to his story. But this moment felt different. It reminded me why I spend so much time doing this work, not just to gather names and dates, but to better understand the lives behind them. Moments like this turn research into connection and make family history feel truly personal.


23 February 2026

The Little Creamer on the Table

You may have read about items I have been fortunate to receive and care for as part of my family history. This small glass creamer is one of those pieces.

It belonged to my grandmother, Daisy Fredricks, and it is the only item I have from her.


Photograph by Brenda Leyndyke

My grandmother came from very humble beginnings, and this creamer reflects that. It is simple pressed glass with a scalloped edge, the kind of everyday piece found in many homes in the early 20th century. Pieces like this were affordable and meant to be used. Today, they are often associated with what collectors call Depression-era glass.

I remember this creamer from visits to her home.

She would make coffee for my mom and set the creamer on the table. There was always a plate of cookies, and for me, a glass of milk.

I can still picture myself sitting at that table.

I do not remember exactly what kind of cookies she served, only that there was always a plate on the table. A few years ago, I shared my grandmother’s oatmeal cookie recipe, written in her own hand. I often wonder if those were the cookies she made when we visited.

I am emotional just writing this. I did not think of these moments as anything special at the time. They were simply part of visiting Grandma. Now, I realize how much those small moments mattered especially since we didn't visit often as we lived hours away from her.

When I look at this creamer today, I think about her hands setting it on the table. I think about the conversations between her and my mom. I think about being included, even as a child, in those quiet visits.

As family historians, we spend a lot of time looking for records and documenting facts. But sometimes it is the everyday items that tell us the most.

This creamer is simple, but it represents something much larger.

It represents a place at the table.

11 September 2025

Ten Things I Learned Researching at the National Archives in D.C. and MD

This summer I spent eight days researching at both National Archives I (downtown Washington, D.C.) and National Archives II (College Park, Maryland). It was an eye-opening experience. Each location has its strengths and quirks, and as a first-time researcher at both, I learned a lot, sometimes the hard way. Here are ten takeaways from my visit.

1. The Catalog Is Huge and Overwhelming

The NARA catalog is not as user-friendly as other archives or library catalogs. The Archives has billions of records in its collection. Search terms that seem obvious do not always work, and narrowing down to the right record group can take persistence. I often felt like I was missing something, especially with less-used collections such as lighthouse records or postmaster files.

2. NARA I Staff Are Friendlier

The staff at Archives I were consistently more approachable, patient, and helpful. They guided me through record requests and explained things clearly. At Archives II, the staff felt more rushed and less friendly, and in some cases the interactions felt accusatory.

3. Accusations at NARA II Felt Uncomfortable

At Archives II, staff patrolled the research room checking for declassification tags on documents being scanned. I was asked multiple times: Do you have a tag? Are you using it on every document? Did you take pictures without it? At one point I was even asked if I had put rusty paper clips on the records. It felt accusatory and unnecessary, especially since paper clips would never make it past security. 

4. Supplies Are Easier to Access at NARA I

At Archives I, basic supplies like weights were readily available. At Archives II, you had to ask for everything, even weights, and sometimes sign them out. It slowed the process and added unnecessary frustration when you didn't know where they were. 

5. Wait Times Vary, but NARA I Did Better

At both archives, wait times for record pulls averaged about 45 minutes. NARA I generally handled requests more smoothly. At NARA II, you had to look up box and row information yourself using binders, while NARA I staff filled that in for you. As a beginner, I really appreciated the extra help.

6. Rules Control the Fun

One thing to know before you go: NARA has 86 rules for researchers. They are available online here: Research Room Rules (https://www.archives.gov/research/research-room-rules). It is best to review them in advance so you know what to expect.

7. Cafeteria and Eating Areas at NARA II Were Better

If you want a good lunch during your research break, Archives II is the place. The cafeteria had more options, and the eating area was spacious and newer. NARA I’s food options were far more limited and others said not as good.  

8. Research Assistance Was Stronger at NARA I

At Archives I, I could easily find someone to answer questions about the materials I was using. At NARA II, there was one specialist for Army records, and he was swamped. I often felt on my own.

Neither archive was able to suggest the correct search terms when I asked about German Prisoners of War at Fort Custer. I was repeatedly told to use “Custer,” which returned results about General Custer. Searching “German Prisoners of War” brought up records about United States soldiers held in Germany. The key term turned out to be “enemy prisoners,” which I eventually discovered on my own. Once I tried that, I found far more relevant information. I was also directed to Record Group 394, Continental Commands, which contained cartographic records but not for the time period I needed. In contrast, Record Group 389, Records of the Provost Marshal (1941– ), was filled with information. 

9. Tracking Records Was Hit or Miss

At NARA II, the electronic monitor in the research room made it easy to know when my records were ready. At NARA I, it was inconsistent. Sometimes staff told me my records were upstairs, sometimes to check if they had been submitted downstairs. Once I wasted two and a half hours looking for my lighthouse records before giving up and coming back the next day. Thankfully, that was an exception, not the rule.

10. Strengths of Each Archive

Archives I excels at military and land records, while Archives II is known for 20th-century military records and modern federal agency records. Accuracy was solid at both locations. Only once did I receive the wrong time period for a record request. 

Rules Control the Fun

One thing to know before you go: NARA has 86 rules for researchers. They are available online here: Research Room Rules (https://www.archives.gov/research/research-room-rules). It is best to review them in advance so you know what to expect.

Final Thoughts

Researching at the National Archives can be rewarding, but it requires patience, persistence, and sometimes a thick skin. I am glad I had the chance to experience both NARA I and II. I learned not only about my research subjects but also about how the archives work.

If you are planning a visit, do your homework ahead of time. The NARA website is filled with finding aids and preparation guides that will make your time there more productive. Some resources I found helpful include:

1. Guide to Genealogical Research in the United States (available at HathiTrust)


2. NARA’s Catalog Guide: https://www.archives.gov/research/genealogy/catalog-guide


3. Preliminary Inventories available online through the Allen County Public Library in Fort Wayne. These help identify the records within each record group. Not all preliminary inventories are digitized here.


4. Prologue Magazine, a NARA publication now out of print, but past issues are available online at archives.gov. It contains a wealth of research tips and background articles.

These tips come from my personal experience, and yours may be different. I spent days preparing for my visit and thought I was ready, only to discover that the archives had even more to teach me. My best advice is to embrace the process and enjoy the experience. Visiting the National Archives had been a dream of mine for years, and finally walking into those research rooms felt like stepping into history itself. No matter the challenges or frustrations, I will always be grateful that I had the chance to be there, to handle original records, and to connect more deeply with the past.


23 August 2025

Why Gen-Fed Belongs on Every Genealogist’s Bucket List

This will be one of many blog posts in the coming weeks about my bucket list attendance at the Genealogical Institute on Federal Records (Gen-Fed) in Washington D.C. Here are my thoughts on why you should attend it.





Why You Should Attend the Genealogical Institute on Federal Records

The Genealogical Institute on Federal Records (Gen-Fed) is an exceptional educational opportunity for genealogists who want to deepen their understanding of federal records and how to use them in research. Held annually in Washington, D.C., this institute brings together expert speakers, hands-on research opportunities, and access to world-class archives.

Hands-On Research at the National Archives

One of the greatest benefits of Gen-Fed is the opportunity to conduct hands-on research at both National Archives I (downtown Washington, D.C.) and National Archives II (College Park, Maryland). You’ll learn how to navigate record groups, request materials, and explore documents that may not be digitized anywhere else. These research experiences are invaluable for uncovering details about ancestors who served in the military, worked for the federal government, or were impacted by federal policies.

Access to World-Class Libraries

In addition to the National Archives, Gen-Fed includes visits to other major repositories such as the Library of Congress and the DAR Library. These visits provide participants with guided orientations to the collections, tips from experienced librarians, and at the DAR Library the chance to explore materials that can enrich family history research.

Learn from the Best

The institute brings together expert genealogical speakers, including professionals who work at the National Archives. Attendees gain valuable knowledge through lectures, workshops, and one-on-one interactions. Topics cover NARA research tools, military service and pension files, land and bounty land records, immigration and naturalization, African American research, legislative and court records, and other specialized collections at NARA. Each session provides practical guidance on applying federal resources to real-world genealogical questions.

Camaraderie and Networking

Another advantage of Gen-Fed is the sense of community it fosters. Spending a week with like-minded researchers fosters collaboration, encouragement, and lifelong friendships. Many participants say that the opportunity to network with others who share their passion for genealogy is one of the most rewarding aspects of the institute. Researchers from 24 states and the Netherlands attended this year. They were from various backgrounds, such as, genealogical society leaders, attorneys, authors, librarians, professors, small business owners and more.

Special Events and Opportunities

Attending Gen-Fed is more than a week of classes at the National Archives. It is a unique experience that provides education with unforgettable opportunities. In addition to expert-led sessions on federal records, participants enjoyed special events such as the 75th Anniversary Commemoration and alumni receptions. Optional tours expand the learning beyond the classroom, with highlights including a National Mall tour of more federal records and individual military consultation. Dedicated research time at Archives I (DC) and Archives II (MD) added to the experience. 

 Why Attend?

Attending the Genealogical Institute on Federal Records is an investment in your skills as a researcher. You’ll return home with new knowledge, hands-on experience, and a deeper appreciation for the breadth of resources available at federal institutions. If you’re serious about genealogy and want to take your research to the next level, Gen-Fed is the place to be. 

Additional Thoughts

You may have heard how hard it is to get into the Gen-Fed Institute. There are requirements and it is limited to about 45 researchers, but don't let that discourage you. If you get wait-listed, be patient. This year the entire wait-list was contacted, so the wait-list works. If you want more information check out the Gen-Fed website:  https://www.gen-fed.org/

I almost forgot to mention the 300 page handbook and numerous dropbox resources. It is incredible. I will be busy reading it all in the weeks ahead.

I felt extremely priviledged and grateful to attend this year. My thanks go to Rebecca, the Director and Mary, Assistant Director for their excellent leadership. Also a very special thanks to the Gen-Fed Alumni Association for the Richard S. Lackey Scholarship that I was awarded.


AI Disclosures

This blog post on Journey to the Past was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI), specifically ChatGPT.

The research, interpretation, and writing are my own. AI was used to provide grammar and style suggestions and to generate the outline and headings for this post.

The title was suggested by AI, but I reviewed, edited, and selected the final version.

The photograph used on this blog post was taken by Brenda Leyndyke.


21 August 2025

My Gen-Fed Journey-75th Year


This summer I had the privilege of attending the Genealogical Institute on Federal Records (Gen-Fed) during its 75th year. For one week, I joined fellow genealogists in Washington, D.C., to immerse myself in federal records, learn from experts, and dig into the archives. It was truly an honor to be part of such a milestone year.

The week was packed with learning, discovery, and inspiration. The 300-page syllabus alone will keep me busy for months, and the consultations and lectures opened doors to research paths I had not considered before. My time at the National Archives, especially working with primary source materials on lighthouse keepers, Civil War soldiers, and German prisoners of war, gave me confidence and focus for the projects closest to my heart.

Being in Washington during historic times made the experience even more powerful. The city was full of change, but I also found grounding in visiting places where history has long been remembered. The memorials and museums that honor those who came before us offered space for reflection. Standing at these sites reminded me that history is never far from the present.

Gen-Fed was not just about records. It was also about community. Surrounded by genealogists who share the same curiosity and passion, I felt like I belonged to something bigger. The dedication of the directors, Rebecca and Mary, and all who worked so hard behind the scenes, was remarkable. Their energy and leadership made the Institute both welcoming and inspiring.

For me, this was more than an educational program. With my husband living with Alzheimer’s and my mother still with me at 95, I knew this would likely be my last big educational journey. I embraced it as my "last hurrah" and I am so grateful I was able to go.

I returned home with scans, notes, and ideas that will fuel my research for a long time. I plan to share what I have learned with researchers at Fort Custer, with families tracing military ancestors, and with those whose loved ones were once prisoners of war. And of course, I will be writing about my discoveries here on the blog.

Gen-Fed’s 75th year was an unforgettable experience, and one I will carry with me always.

15 July 2025

Book Launch Day — and Why I’m Still Proud

Today is the official launch day for my book, Fort Custer in the World Wars. It’s hard to put into words what this moment means. After years of research, writing, editing, and reviewing hundreds of photographs, the book is finally out in the world. It’s real. It’s here.

This isn’t just a collection of images and facts, it’s a tribute. To the soldiers who trained at Fort Custer. To the medical staff who cared for the wounded. To the prisoners of war who lived and worked on the grounds. And to the community that grew around it. Preserving this history matters, and I’m honored to be a small part of it.

While the day didn’t unfold quite the way I imagined, I’m still celebrating because I believe in the power of telling these stories. I’m grateful to my husband Kirk for standing beside me through every page, to the Fort Custer Historical Society for their support, and to the many people who’ve already purchased the book, shared kind words, or reached out.

There are appearances, presentations, and book talks to come, but today, I’m pausing to appreciate what’s been accomplished.

If you’d like to learn more about the book, you can find it through local bookstores, or by contacting me directly.

Thank you for walking this journey with me.